Whether it’s performed by a
peer, a professional, or the author, editing is by far the most crucial
stage of the writing process. It’s the only way to ensure high quality
and optimum readability.
Writing without editing is like getting dressed with your eyes
closed, and then leaving the house without looking in the mirror. If you
don’t at least check your reflection, then what’s to stop you from
parading around town with misaligned buttons, an Alfalfa cowlick, or one
pant leg that’s three inches shorter than the other? Nothing—that’s
what. Even if you opened your eyes and looked down at your outfit, you
wouldn’t be getting the full picture. Your perspective would still be
limited (and that cowlick would still adorn your noggin like a dunce
cap). The same is true for writing.
When drafting, the writer’s focus in inherently narrowed, and
rightfully so—how can you paint a scene or express an idea if you’re
worried about comma splices, semicolons, pacing, and/or stylistic
consistency? Simply put: you can’t. If you tried, you’d be writing that
first draft for an awfully long time (and you’d probably end up with a
disjointed manuscript because scrutinizing every sentence inevitably
affects the flow of a piece—stifling that stream-of-consciousness feel).
That brings me back to a reiteration of this point: Editing apart from writing is
the only way to ensure high quality and optimum readability. Our brains
function best when we compartmentalize tasks, even though we like to
think otherwise. Take texting and driving. When you text and drive you
are making life harder (and much more dangerous) than it needs to be.
You are sacrificing the quality of your driving and texting for quantity—getting
more stuff done in less time. (Ryan: “Hey dud, Im on they may”; You:
“What on Earth are you blathering about, fool?”) It’s much easier and
more effective to just separate the tasks and allow yourself to focus on
one thing at a time. In the writing process, this means write first,
edit later. Here’s the catch: you actually have to do the editing!
What’s the key to effective editing, you ask? Why, compartmentalization, of course!
Just like you can’t simultaneously write and edit or text and drive,
there are editorial tasks which must be tackled one at a time. This is
precisely why we make distinctions between the “levels” of editing. Line Editing and Proofreading concern themselves with the superficial features of a manuscript: syntax, diction, typos, etc. Structural Editing,
on the other hand, reaches down into the depths of the content to bring
the manuscript to its full potential. As the name suggests, this level
of editing scrutinizes all aspects of the content—point of view,
details/descriptions, characterization, overall structure, etc. If it
can benefit the manuscript, it’s on the table.
Now, if you think about it, compartmentalizing these levels of
editing makes total sense; you’d be wasting time if you were to do line
editing before comprehensive editing. Why obsess over the grammar of a
manuscript if its very content is subject to change? Just like that
typo-ridden text that you had to edit and re-send, you’d have to re-do
the line editing, i.e., making the process harder than it needs to be.
So after you’ve written your first draft, don’t worry about proofreading
or line editing. That would just be a distraction at this early stage
in the game. Instead, roll up your sleeves and dig in to some
comprehensive editing.
Where does the professional editor fit into this cacophony of
compartmentalization? I’m glad you asked! The editor is the epitome of
what I’m getting at here. The editor is the reader’s advocate—that’s it.
That’s all he/she is concerned about. You can’t get any more
compartmentalized than that. For proofreading and line editing, the goal
of a professional editor is to facilitate reader comprehension. For
comprehensive editing, the goal is to help the writer produce the most
engaging, clear and concise document possible, for the reader’s benefit,
of course. With the professional, you get fresh eyes, supreme
objectivity, and a specialist with working knowledge of writing.
Sample |
Wouldn’t you rather have your manuscript put under the microscope before you
publish it? I know I would, especially since it’s going to be
scrutinized by readers, reviewers, and internet trolls anyway. And
unlike the trolls and reviewers, a good editor is always constructive,
solution-oriented, and there to help, not criticize.
Not quite sure what level of editing you need? Visit our website www.blacktowerpublishers.com.ng/whatweoffer.html and see how you can purchase professional editing service for your manuscript.
Until next time, I bid you good writing!
Wow, great post.
ReplyDeleteYou talk about manuscripts editing service importance things. I have seen this post. I also visit you another website for more information. I need a useful link about proofread my draft service.
ReplyDelete